Aurangzeb apologists try to portray him as a secular, sympathetic ruler which he was not.
Aurangzeb apologists try to portray him as a secular, sympathetic ruler which he was not.
↧
Fact check: was Aurangzeb a “secular” ruler as his sympathisers claim he was?
Aurangzeb apologists try to portray him as a secular, sympathetic ruler which he was not.
↧